This is a list of papers relating to transgene escape from genetically modified organisms (mostly crop plants) to the wild populations. The list doesn’t contain all papers on the subject and might occasionally be updated.
“Born to Run”? Not Necessarily: Species and Trait Bias in Persistent Free-Living Transgenic Plants (Ellstrand, 2018)
“Three decades have passed since the first environmental release of transgenic plants, and more than two decades since their first commercialization. Examples of transgenes gone astray are increasingly commonplace. Transgenic individuals have been identified in more than a thousand free-living plant populations.”
“The traits commonly occurring in species with persistent transgenic free-living populations are the following, in descending order of importance: (1) a history of occurring as non-transgenic free-living plants, (2) fruits fully or partially shattering prior to harvest, (3) have small or otherwise easily dispersed seeds, either spontaneously or by seed spillage along the supply chain from harvest to consumer, (4) ability to disperse viable pollen, especially to a kilometer or more, (5) perennial habit, and (6) the transgene’s fitness effects in the recipient environment are beneficial or neutral.”
Transgene escape and persistence in an agroecosystem: the case of glyphosate-resistant Brassica rapa L. in central Argentina (Pandolfo et al. 2018)
“During 2014, wild B. rapa populations that escaped control with glyphosate applications by farmers were found in this area. These plants were characterized by morphology and seed acidic profile, and all the characters agreed with B. rapa description. The dose-response assays showed that the biotypes were highly resistant to glyphosate. It was also shown that they had multiple resistance to AHAS-inhibiting herbicides. The transgenic origin of the glyphosate resistance in B. rapa biotypes was verified by an immunological test which confirmed the presence of the CP4 EPSPS protein and by an event-specific GT73 molecular marker. The persistence of the transgene in nature was confirmed for at least 4 years, in ruderal and agrestal habitats. This finding suggests that glyphosate resistance might come from GM oilseed rape crops illegally cultivated in the country or as a seed contaminant, and it implies gene flow and introgression between feral populations of GM B. napus and wild B. rapa.”
Potential for gene flow from genetically modified Brassica napus on the territory of Russia (Mikhaylova & Kuluev, 2018)
“We observed maximum 4.1% of transgenic seeds in the progeny of Brassica rapa and 0.6% in the progeny of Brassica juncea. The highest intraspecific hybridization rate of 0.67% was observed in separated populations. DNA fragments, typical to both parents, were present in the genome of the hybrids. The risk of gene flow in Russia is relatively low, but it will be problematic to do environmental monitoring on such a big territory.”
An Empirical Assessment of Transgene Flow from a Bt Transgenic Poplar Plantation (Hu et al. 2017)
“The results of this study indicate that gene flow originating from the Bt poplar plantation occurred at an extremely low level through pollen or seeds under natural conditions.”
High-Resolution Gene Flow Model for Assessing Environmental Impacts of Transgene Escape Based on Biological Parameters and Wind Speed (Wang et al. 2016)
“Here, we present a quasi-mechanistic PMGF model that only requires the input of biological and wind speed parameters without actual data from field experiments.”
Experimental assessment of gene flow between transgenic squash and a wild relative in the center of origin of cucurbits (Cruz-Reyes et al. 2015)
“Given that the hybrid and BC progeny were viable and fertile, the escape and persistence of the transgene is possible via wild populations of C. argyrosperma ssp. sororia.”
Quantifying transgene flow rate in transgenic Sclerotinia-resistant peanut lines (Hu et al. 2015)
“The overall transgene flow rate in three cultivars was 0.2094% based on screening over 85,000 seeds. In general, the transgene flow rate greatly declined past 10 m from the transgene source. However, a transgene flow rate of less than 0.05% did occur sporadically at greater distances than 10 m.”
Transgene flow: Facts, speculations and possible countermeasures (Ryffel, 2014)
“Convincing evidence has accumulated that unintended transgene escape occurs in oilseed rape, maize, cotton and creeping bentgrass. The escaped transgenes are found in variant cultivars, in wild type plants as well as in hybrids of sexually compatible species. The fact that in some cases stacked events are present that have not been planted commercially, implies unintended recombination of transgenic traits. As the consequences of this continuous transgene escape for the ecosystem cannot be reliably predicted, I propose to use more sophisticated approaches of gene technology in future.”
Flower‐visiting insects and their potential impact on transgene flow in rice (Pu et al. 2014)
“European honeybees carry viable pollen over long distances, forage on rice flowers regularly and increase the frequency of transgene flow. Insects mediate gene flow in rice more than previously assumed, and this should be taken into consideration during the ecological risk assessment of transgene flow in self‐pollinated and/or anemophilous crops.”
Crossing the divide: gene flow produces intergeneric hybrid in feral transgenic creeping bentgrass population (Zapiola & Mallory-Smith, 2012)
“This first report of a transgenic intergeneric hybrid produced in situ with a regulated transgenic event demonstrates the importance of considering all possible avenues for transgene spread at the landscape level before planting a regulated transgenic crop in the field. Spontaneous hybridization adds a level of complexity to transgene monitoring, containment, mitigation and remediation programmes.”
Performance of hybrids between transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and wild Brassica juncea: An evaluation of potential for transgene escape (Huangfu et al. 2011)
“The analysis of parental loci transmission revealed a higher transfer ratio of male-specific loci detected in F1 hybrids, suggesting that oilseed rape genetic markers can be transferred at relatively high frequencies to the next generation. Therefore, higher transfer ratio of oilseed rape-specific loci, coupled with variation of populations in fitness-related parameters in F1 hybrids, could complicate environmental risk assessment of transgenic oilseed rape, especially in current agroecosystems with increasing application of glyphosate.”
Glyphosate drift promotes changes in fitness and transgene gene flow in canola (Brassica napus) and hybrids (Londo et al. 2010)
“The results of this study demonstrate the potential for persistence of glyphosate resistance transgenes in weedy plant communities due to the effect of glyphosate spray drift on plant fitness. Additionally, glyphosate drift has the potential to change the gene-flow dynamics between compatible transgenic crops and weeds, simultaneously reducing direct introgression into weedy species while contributing to an increase in the transgenic seed bank.”
Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population (Warwick et al. 2008)
“These observations confirm the persistence of the HR trait over time. Persistence occurred over a 6‐year period, in the absence of herbicide selection pressure (with the exception of possible exposure to glyphosate in 2002), and in spite of the fitness cost associated with hybridization.”
Transgene escape in sugar beet production fields: data from six years farm scale monitoring (Darmency et al. 2007)
“Herbicide-resistant seeds from the progeny of the weed beet were recorded up to 112 m away from the closest transgenic pollen donor.”
A large‐scale field study of transgene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to common wild rice (O. rufipogon) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli) (Wang et al. 2006)
“There was a high frequency of transgene flow (11%−18%) at 0–1 m, with a steep decline with increasing distance to a detection limit of 0.01% by 250 m. To our knowledge, this is the highest frequency and longest distance of gene flow from transgenic rice to O. rufipogon reported so far.”
Transgene escape: what potential for crop–wild hybridization? (Armstrong et al. 2005)
“We used this approach to assess the potential for transgene escape via hybridization for 123 widely grown temperate crops and their indigenous and naturalized relatives present in the New Zealand flora. We found that 66 crops (54%) are reproductively compatible with at least one other indigenous or naturalized species in the flora. Limited reproductive compatibility with wild relatives was evident for a further 12 crops (10%).”
A Bt Transgene Reduces Herbivory and Enhances Fecundity in Wild Sunflowers (Snow et al., 2003)
“Here, we report the first empirical evidence that wild plants can benefit from a bacterial transgene under uncaged, natural conditions. Cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) is known to hybridize frequently with wild sunflower (H. annuus) in the western and midwestern United States.”
“If Bt sunflowers are released commercially, we expect that Bt genes will spread to wild and weedy populations, limit damage from susceptible herbivores on these plants, and increase seed production when these herbivores are common.”
Potential Persistence of Transgenes: Seed Performance of Transgenic Canola and Wild × Canola Hybrids (Linder, 1998)
“These results suggest that high‐laurate wild–crop hybrids lack germination cuing mechanisms and will germinate primarily at inappropriate times. However, when they do germinate with wild B. rapa, they are likely to compete well with it because the high‐laurate hybrids germinated and grew as fast or faster than their wild parental control. This should provide opportunities for backcrossing to wild B. rapa.”
Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rapeseed under insect selection pressure (Stewart et al., 1997)
“Only two plants, both transgenic, survived the winter to reproduce in the natural‐vegetation plots which were dominated by grasses such as crabgrass. However, in plots that were initially cultivated then allowed to naturalize, medium to high levels of defoliation decreased survivorship of nontransgenic plants relative to Bt‐transgenic plants and increased differential reproduction in favour of Bt plants. Thus, where suitable habitat is readily available, there is a likelihood of enhanced ecological risk associated with the release of certain transgene/crop combinations such as insecticidal rapeseed.”
Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations (Bartsch et al., 1996)
“In experimental field releases in 1993 and 1994 in Germany, a small but increasingly clear ‘additive’ ecological advantage of the genetically engineered trait was detected. In both years and all competition treatments, the conventional tolerant variety performed best. An impact of naturalization on natural, non‐agricultural habitats may appear in wild beet populations in Italian seed beet production areas. However, a survey of coastal areas of North‐Eastern Italy found no virus infestation in 1994, suggesting that an increase in wild beet fitness is unlikely to occur.”
Transgenic plants and the environment (Rogers & Parkes, 1995)
“With a continued increase in the range of transgenes, and plant species for which genetic modification is possible, this review attempts to bring together some of the factors that will influence the eventual fate of transgenes in the environment, and the effects that such a dispersal may have.”
Potential Persistence of Escaped Transgenes: Performance of Transgenic, Oil‐Modified Brassica Seeds and Seedlings (Linder & Schmitt, 1995)
“Our results indicate that high‐laurate hybrids, emerged from shallow depths, may experience performance advantages that will allow them to perform as well as their persistent, wild parent.”
Community response to transgenic plant release: predictions from British experience of invasive plants and feral crop plants (Williamson, 1994)
“GMOs, being mainly derived from crop plants, and in some cases with genes that are likely to enhance survival, can be expected to have an appreciable effect on nonagricultural ecosystems, once a range of different constructs have been released. Familiarity is unlikely to be an effective defence against new ecological effects.”
Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically manipulated organisms (Williamson, 1993)
“Small genetic changes can cause large ecological changes. GMOs will have characters entirely new to that species’ evolutionary history. While most will have little ecological effect, a few may be ecologically and economically damaging.”
Genetically Modified Crops and Hybridization with Wild Relatives: A UK Perspective (Raybould & Gray, 1993)
A review article.
Environmental risks from the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)–the need for molecular ecology (Williamson, 1992)
“Applications to release genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into the environment, usually the agricultural environment, are increasing exponentially. Many involve crop plants that are also weeds. Studies of biological invasions and of biological control show that the probability that a genetically new organism establishing itself is small; it is also unpredictable and in some cases could have severe ecological effects. GMOs pose risks both because they will be released in large numbers and because the greater the genetic novelty the greater the possibility of ecological novelty. Molecular ecology is an essential ingredient in ensuring that risks are assessed efficiently.”